We at HartfordCommunityCourt.com have been closely following the case of Connecticut v. Jonathan Reich. The case against Mr. Reich has been ongoing for over three years. There have been numerous violations of the legal process and Mr. Reich’s Constitutional rights. Our journalists will continue to expose the corrupt “public servants” of the Hartford Judicial District responsible for targeting and maliciously prosecuting Mr. Reich.
A motion of discovery in the case of Connecticut v. Jonathan Reich dated, October 8, 2015, filed by Jonathan Reich’s defense counsel has gone unanswered for over 1-year now. Carl Ajello of the Hartford State’s Attorney’s Office has refused to perform his taxpayer-funded duties of answering Jonathan Reich’s attorney’s discovery motion. Judge Raymond Norko, Judge Sheila Prats, Senior Assistant State’s Thomas J. O’Brien and Hartford State’s Attorney Gail P. Hardy have aided Carl Ajello in this matter and are equally responsible for this injustice. Carl Ajello refused to answer telephone calls from our journalists on multiple occasions over the past year.
Carl Ajello purports to represent Syracuse University on his Twitter profile page. His son, Jackson Ajello, attends the S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University. One of our sources reports that Jackson Ajello may be assisting Carl Ajello with online social media attacks against Jonathan Reich.
As we further examine the case of Connecticut v. Jonathan Reich, Docket # H14H-CR13-0116876-T, a discovery motion was filed on October 8, 2015 by the defense attorney at Hartford Superior Court. The 45-day time period to produce an answer and detailed response to the discovery had expired already, before the defendant’s scheduled court date of November 25, 2015.
The State of Connecticut was already in violation of their own CT Judicial Branch Practice Book and the GENERAL STATUTES OF CONNECTICUT before Jonathan Reich even had his next court date of November 25, 2015. How did the Judge of the Hartford Superior Court issue an arrest warrant knowing that a discovery request was already entered previously and the State was already in violation at that time? This shows bias towards the defendant, Jonathan Reich, without acknowledging the State’s violation for not producing the documentation to Jonathan Reich, or his defense counsel.
That Discovery Motion for 28 items of evidence and police reports, including the Un-Redacted Sandy Hook School Shooting Report was requested, and the relevant discovery request remains unanswered as of today’s date. Recently released public documents involving the mainstream media and particular court cases have been brought to the attention of HartfordCommunityCourt.com. There is one court case that has stood firm on what the media is capable of, regarding manipulating news reports, when the stories involve the media itself and the company it keeps.
The mainstream media has neglected their duties and has refused to report on a court case of national attention. The lawsuit of Jonathan Reich v. Charles C. Hale, Hale Global, Patch Media et al., Index No. 156787/2016, will likely put multiple mainstream news companies to shame exposing the media’s involvement. Patch not only fabricated false information but their journalist, Jessie Sawyer, was caught sensationalizing stories to manipulate the public. It is unfortunate to viewers of the national stage that the highly particularized data was not expressly reported to and by mainstream media’s viewership. It is disheartening to see that fellow journalists and bloggers have either refused to report or do not factually portray the accuracy and status pending data on the New York court case details on their website.
The court case accurately portrays a series of events in which mainstream media falsified their reporting and narrative multiple times. This has caused political operatives to mislead the public based upon the false information purposely created by those news organizations involved. This is clearly shown within the newest Wikileaks documentation of emails shown and their contents relative to the media.
It is unfortunate for HartfordCommunityCourt.com to respond in this way regarding current events, but we have no choice but to report on the documents available to the public especially when other media outlets are solely politically motivated to conceal the truth from the public. When this case was directly brought to the attention of numerous reporters of varying mainstream outlets, a blind eye was the response.
The following is a direct quote from Paragraph 44 in the lawsuit: “The statements contained within the news articles have subjected Plaintiff to “trial-by-media” and exposed Plaintiff to civil rights violations and discriminatory treatment within the Hartford Judicial System by State Employees, targeting Plaintiff for over three (3) years. Defendants impeded Plaintiff’s right to a fair jury trial by swaying the public’s opinion of Plaintiff before arraignment, revealing alleged witness names, and carelessly endangering and revealing alleged witnesses.”
We direct our viewers to the documents and the court case itself in which it is duly noted that the timeline of this court case is very crucial. Our analysis at HartfordCommunityCourt.com, based on the court documents, shows that the response submitted by the Defendants, Charles C. Hale, Warren St. John, Jessica L. Sawyer, Hale Global, & Patch, represented by Joel G. MacMull of Archer & Greiner P.C., is not a response at all and does not address the complaint or its points whatsoever.
Thank You for your continuous appreciated support and viewership. HartfordCommunityCourt.com continues to expose the major players in Hartford that are targeting Jonathan Reich and will be releasing exclusive details about Carl Ajello and his associates that will leave you shocked and infuriated.
– The HCC Team