We at HartfordCommunityCourt.com would like our readers to be informed about what the mainstream media has been working on behind the scenes to continue producing false and defamatory news articles about candidate Donald J. Trump. As one would learn from observing the documentary Clinton Cash, “everything is for sale,” especially the State Department itself.
Clinton Cash investigates how Bill and Hillary Clinton went from being “dead broke” after leaving the White House to amassing a net worth of over $150 million, with over $2 billion in donations to their foundation. This wealth was accumulated during Mrs. Clinton’s tenure as US Secretary of State through lucrative speaking fees and contracts paid for by foreign companies and Clinton Foundation donors. Clinton’s reach holds direct ties to Governor Dannel P. Malloy, the State of Connecticut, and stretches out over the control of mainstream media including networks. This includes names such as CNN, ABC, MSNBC, FOX, CBS, WFSB, Huffington Post, The New York Times, and even more local venues such as Patch.
Hillary Clinton and her campaign are being promoted almost exclusively by liberal media outlets endorsing propaganda and anti-Constitutional ideals. The latest false accusation sold by the media is with two elderly women directly connected to the Democratic Party featured by the The New York Times in an interview. The New York Times published a libelous article on October 12, 2016 entitled Two Women Say Donald Trump Touched Them Inappropriately.
In an article and video interview by The Telegraph, dated October 13, 2016, a claim and statement was made by Jessica Leeds, that “Donald Trump ‘was like an octopus.’” Suspiciously, Jessica Leeds’ false accusations and her statements were portrayed to the public as a candid video interview. Upon further examination, her accusations are plagiarized and fabricated from an article by The Guardian, another UK news media outlet, dated January 17, 2014, with the headline “Bill Roache ‘was like an octopus,’ sexual abuse trial hears.” The article defaming Donald Trump in The Telegraph, is reckless, malicious, and based upon an entirely unrelated incident. Leeds’ statements were in reality sourced from the article by The Guardian in 2014. This clearly shows the links of cooperation between political criminals like Hillary Clinton and their media counterparts.
In reference to a civil lawsuit initiated by Donna L. Soto and other Sandy Hook families against Bushmaster Firearms International a/k/a Freedom Group, Inc. a/k/a Remington Outdoor Group Inc., the case cannot move forward and/or settle because of the relevant referenced material for a motion of discovery in the case of Connecticut v. Jonathan Reich dated, October 8, 2015, has gone unanswered for over 1-year now. Carl Ajello of the Hartford State’s Attorney’s Office has refused to perform his taxpayer-funded duties of answering Jonathan Reich’s attorney’s discovery motion.
***UPDATE*** Before publication of this article, State Superior Court Judge Barbara Bellis, granted a motion by Remington Arms to strike the wrongful death lawsuit, according to the Associated Press (AP) and WTNH. There is reasonable suspicion that the Remington Arms case could not go forward because of the Reich case and the details confined within it.
In regards to the case of Connecticut v. Jonathan Reich, Docket # H14H-CR13-0116876-T, a discovery motion was filed on October 8, 2015 by the defense attorney at Hartford Superior Court. (Reference Last Page For Stamped Acceptance of the Discovery Request).
The 45-day time period to produce an answer and detailed response to the discovery had expired already, before the defendant’s scheduled court date of November 25, 2015.
The State of Connecticut was already in violation of their own CT Judicial Branch Practice Book and the GENERAL STATUTES OF CONNECTICUT before Jonathan Reich even had his next court date of November 25, 2015. How did the Judge of the Hartford Superior Court issue an arrest warrant knowing that a discovery request was already entered previously and the State was already in violation at that time? This shows bias towards the defendant, Jonathan Reich, without acknowledging the State’s violation for not producing the documentation to Jonathan Reich, or his defense counsel. That Discovery Motion for 28 items of evidence and police reports, including the Un-Redacted Sandy Hook School Shooting Report was requested, and the relevant discovery request remains unanswered as of today’s date October 14, 2016. Recently released public documents involving the mainstream media and particular court cases have been brought to the attention of HartfordCommunityCourt.com. There is one court case that has stood firm on what the media is capable of, regarding manipulating news reports, when the stories involve the media itself and the company it keeps.
The mainstream media has neglected their duties and has refused to report on a court case of national attention. The lawsuit of Jonathan Reich v. Charles C. Hale, Hale Global, Patch Media et al., Index No. 156787/2016, will likely put multiple mainstream news companies to shame exposing the media’s involvement. Patch not only fabricated false information but their journalist, Jessie Sawyer, was caught sensationalizing stories to manipulate the public. It is unfortunate to viewers of the national stage that the highly particularized data was not expressly reported to and by mainstream media’s viewership. It is disheartening to see that fellow journalists and bloggers have either refused to report or do not factually portray the accuracy and status pending data on the New York court case details on their website.
The court case accurately portrays a series of events in which mainstream media falsified their reporting and narrative multiple times. This has caused political operatives to mislead the public based upon the false information purposely created by those news organizations involved. This is clearly shown within the newest Wikileaks documentation of emails shown and their contents relative to the media.
It is unfortunate for HartfordCommunityCourt.com to respond in this way regarding current events, but we have no choice but to report on the documents available to the public especially when other media outlets are solely politically motivated to conceal the truth from the public. When this case was directly brought to the attention of numerous reporters of varying mainstream outlets, a blind eye was the response.
The following is a direct quote from Paragraph 44 in the lawsuit: “The statements contained within the news articles have subjected Plaintiff to “trial-by-media” and exposed Plaintiff to civil rights violations and discriminatory treatment within the Hartford Judicial System by State Employees, targeting Plaintiff for over three (3) years. Defendants impeded Plaintiff’s right to a fair jury trial by swaying the public’s opinion of Plaintiff before arraignment, revealing alleged witness names, and carelessly endangering and revealing alleged witnesses.”
We direct our viewers to the documents and the court case itself in which it is duly noted that the timeline of this court case is very crucial. Our analysis at HartfordCommunityCourt.com, based on the court documents, shows that the response submitted by the Defendants, Charles C. Hale, Warren St. John, Jessica L. Sawyer, Hale Global, & Patch, represented by Joel G. MacMull of Archer & Greiner P.C., is not a response at all and does not address the complaint or its points whatsoever.
Steps To Access The Lawsuit– Jonathan Reich v. Charles C. Hale & Patch
New York County Supreme Court – Index No. 156787/2016
1) Go to: http://www.nycourts.gov/efile
2) Click on: “Create an account”
3) Click on: “Search as Guest”
4) Enter the numbers and letters in the captcha on the screen
5) Enter the following into the ‘Case Number’ field: “156787/2016” & Search
6) Click on the link labeled “156787/2016” to view the case documents
The journalistic capabilities at Hartford Community Court reflect the strongest and most accurate data possible for reporting credibility. We take it upon ourselves to give journalism a real name again outside of the mainstream press, in order to restore those great rights, which seem to be under siege. Thank You for your continuous appreciated support and viewership.
– The HCC Team